Comments on: How to Get Your Web 2.0 Brand Past the “Did you Mean” in Search http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/ SEO for All Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:39:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Adodis http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-5198 Adodis Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:09:24 +0000 http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-5198 Yes, Exactly i have the same problem. This did u mean option provide by google. is good. but when i search my website http://www.adodis.com it is giving me did u mean adidas. can u tell me how can i over come this. my other sites are not having any problem... Yes, Exactly i have the same problem.
This did u mean option provide by google. is good.

but when i search my website http://www.adodis.com
it is giving me did u mean adidas.
can u tell me how can i over come this.
my other sites are not having any problem…

]]> By: 7 Months to Get Past Google’s “Did you Mean…” | SoloSEO Blog http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-4502 7 Months to Get Past Google’s “Did you Mean…” | SoloSEO Blog Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:19:09 +0000 http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-4502 [...] One of my early posts to the SoloSEO blog was How to Get Your Web 2.0 Brand Past the “Did you Mean” in Search, and I discussed how in Google if you searched for our brand name “soloseo” Google would come back and say “Did you mean: colosseo”. Well, it’s time to celebrate around here…we have overcome! No longer will Google give a suggestion, but now it knows that when people search for “soloseo” they mean it! [...] […] One of my early posts to the SoloSEO blog was How to Get Your Web 2.0 Brand Past the “Did you Mean” in Search, and I discussed how in Google if you searched for our brand name “soloseo” Google would come back and say “Did you mean: colosseo”. Well, it’s time to celebrate around here…we have overcome! No longer will Google give a suggestion, but now it knows that when people search for “soloseo” they mean it! […]

]]> By: SoloSEO Blog » Google Algorithm Contains Infinite Loop http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-350 SoloSEO Blog » Google Algorithm Contains Infinite Loop Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:46:06 +0000 http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-350 [...] From a comment on a recent post of mine about getting your Web 2.0 brand past Google’s spell checker, I fell upon what I’m calling an “infinite loop” in Google. [...] […] From a comment on a recent post of mine about getting your Web 2.0 brand past Google’s spell checker, I fell upon what I’m calling an “infinite loop” in Google. […]

]]> By: Kevin Henney http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-167 Kevin Henney Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:35:18 +0000 http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2006/12/19/get-your-web-2-0-brand-past-did-you-mean-in-search/#comment-167 As far as I know, Google's been pretty quiet about the algorithm behind their spell checker. Presence would seem to make the most sense, but some mispelled searches don't get corrected even though they're included on only a handful of web pages. Studying these edge cases might provide some clues to how the spell checker works. "phonitick spewling" and "spehl korector" are a couple of phrases that google doesn't try to correct, even though they appear on less than 150 pages. As far as I know, Google’s been pretty quiet about the algorithm behind their spell checker. Presence would seem to make the most sense, but some mispelled searches don’t get corrected even though they’re included on only a handful of web pages. Studying these edge cases might provide some clues to how the spell checker works. “phonitick spewling” and “spehl korector” are a couple of phrases that google doesn’t try to correct, even though they appear on less than 150 pages.

]]>