<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Novel Link Building Technique &#8211; Optimize Existing Backlinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/</link>
	<description>SEO for All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WebPromote PPC Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-10425</link>
		<dc:creator>WebPromote PPC Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/#comment-10425</guid>
		<description>I think the title of the article is appropriate. It is a &quot;novel&quot; link building technique...one I haven&#039;t seen elsewhere. I think it will work best for sites with more than 30 or so unique backlinks where you just cherry pick the ones that are both valuable and easy (meaning you have a relationship with them or it looks easy to change). It&#039;s the 80/20 rule, just pick the 20% of your backlinks that aren&#039;t linking well to you that based on Page Rank and other factors you feel will generate 80% of the benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the title of the article is appropriate. It is a &#8220;novel&#8221; link building technique&#8230;one I haven&#8217;t seen elsewhere. I think it will work best for sites with more than 30 or so unique backlinks where you just cherry pick the ones that are both valuable and easy (meaning you have a relationship with them or it looks easy to change). It&#8217;s the 80/20 rule, just pick the 20% of your backlinks that aren&#8217;t linking well to you that based on Page Rank and other factors you feel will generate 80% of the benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tejvan Net Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Tejvan Net Writing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>I have to agree it&#039;s quite alot of work, with no guarantee of success. Maybe better just to work on getting new links - unless its easy to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree it&#8217;s quite alot of work, with no guarantee of success. Maybe better just to work on getting new links &#8211; unless its easy to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Money</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-4345</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/25/a-novel-link-building-technique-optimize-existing-backlinks/#comment-4345</guid>
		<description>This sounds even harder than getting new links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds even harder than getting new links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

