<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Googlerithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/</link>
	<description>SEO for All</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to select and use anchor text effectively &#171; one cool site: wordpress blogging tips</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-16301</link>
		<dc:creator>How to select and use anchor text effectively &#171; one cool site: wordpress blogging tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-16301</guid>
		<description>[...] help when us learn how use anchor text to procure high results in search engine results pages. The Extended Link information at your Google Sitemap account. Another useful must-have Firefox add-on for webmasters, two simple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] help when us learn how use anchor text to procure high results in search engine results pages. The Extended Link information at your Google Sitemap account. Another useful must-have Firefox add-on for webmasters, two simple [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Anchor &#187; Misspellings: The Fate of the Keywords Meta Tag</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-11032</link>
		<dc:creator>In Anchor &#187; Misspellings: The Fate of the Keywords Meta Tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-11032</guid>
		<description>[...] If I had say in the Googlerithm, I would tie the spelling functions with the search functions, and if a page ranked well for a certain phrase, but the user misspelled the phrase, I would certainly give more relevance to a page that had the misspelling on it (albeit in a keyword meta tag). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If I had say in the Googlerithm, I would tie the spelling functions with the search functions, and if a page ranked well for a certain phrase, but the user misspelled the phrase, I would certainly give more relevance to a page that had the misspelling on it (albeit in a keyword meta tag). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fate of the Keywords Meta Tag: Misspellings &#124; SoloSEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-8439</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fate of the Keywords Meta Tag: Misspellings &#124; SoloSEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-8439</guid>
		<description>[...] If I had say in the Googlerithm, I would tie the spelling functions with the search functions, and if a page ranked well for a certain phrase, but the user misspelled the phrase, I would certainly give more relevance to a page that had the misspelling on it (albeit in a keyword meta tag). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If I had say in the Googlerithm, I would tie the spelling functions with the search functions, and if a page ranked well for a certain phrase, but the user misspelled the phrase, I would certainly give more relevance to a page that had the misspelling on it (albeit in a keyword meta tag). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-5518</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-5518</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.  I'm always looking to learn more about what Google is trying to do. Nice site, keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.  I&#8217;m always looking to learn more about what Google is trying to do. Nice site, keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-5002</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-5002</guid>
		<description>Here is a very informative post on factors effecting google ranking

http://seoz.wordpres.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a very informative post on factors effecting google ranking</p>
<p><a href="http://seoz.wordpres.com" rel="nofollow">http://seoz.wordpres.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Ireland &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google uses WHOIS Data?</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-5000</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Ireland &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google uses WHOIS Data?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-5000</guid>
		<description>[...] At first I thought, okay maybe it is pulling the name from another meta tag…nope! I did a quick site: query and found really only one page, the contact us page, that the company name could be pulled from. Then I thought, Google wouldn’t go to a contact us page for that, too much variability. Seeming that Google is a registrar, and we all know how important domain age is to the Googlerithm, why not go to the WHOIS data for the title page? Sure enough, the title listed in Google is an EXACT MATCH to the registrant data for the domain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] At first I thought, okay maybe it is pulling the name from another meta tag…nope! I did a quick site: query and found really only one page, the contact us page, that the company name could be pulled from. Then I thought, Google wouldn’t go to a contact us page for that, too much variability. Seeming that Google is a registrar, and we all know how important domain age is to the Googlerithm, why not go to the WHOIS data for the title page? Sure enough, the title listed in Google is an EXACT MATCH to the registrant data for the domain. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empty Title Tag = Google uses WHOIS data? &#124; SoloSEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>Empty Title Tag = Google uses WHOIS data? &#124; SoloSEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>[...] At first I thought, okay maybe it is pulling the name from another meta tag&#8230;nope! I did a quick site: query and found really only one page, the contact us page, that the company name could be pulled from. Then I thought, Google wouldn&#8217;t go to a contact us page for that, too much variability. Seeming that Google is a registrar, and we all know how important domain age is to the Googlerithm, why not go to the WHOIS data for the title page? Sure enough, the title listed in Google is an EXACT MATCH to the registrant data for the domain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] At first I thought, okay maybe it is pulling the name from another meta tag&#8230;nope! I did a quick site: query and found really only one page, the contact us page, that the company name could be pulled from. Then I thought, Google wouldn&#8217;t go to a contact us page for that, too much variability. Seeming that Google is a registrar, and we all know how important domain age is to the Googlerithm, why not go to the WHOIS data for the title page? Sure enough, the title listed in Google is an EXACT MATCH to the registrant data for the domain. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/07/17/the-googlerithm/#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>Don't under estimate the importance of age. The strongest domains out there are old, authoritative monsters.

Although, I do feel this is a metric that will be loosened as time goes on, to allow new sites the chance to rank with the big boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t under estimate the importance of age. The strongest domains out there are old, authoritative monsters.</p>
<p>Although, I do feel this is a metric that will be loosened as time goes on, to allow new sites the chance to rank with the big boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
