<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SoloSEO Blog &#187; Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/category/analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog</link>
	<description>SEO for All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tracking Twitter Traffic Trick</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2008/05/22/tracking-twitter-traffic-trick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2008/05/22/tracking-twitter-traffic-trick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael D Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has become a great place to network, vent, and share links, including your own blog posts. But how do you quantify the traffic you are getting from Twitter, especially if people are using applications like Twhirl, or even a mobile phone? I&#8217;ve got a special trick for you, and it&#8217;s really easy to do!
Now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a> has become a great place to network, vent, and share links, including your own blog posts. But how do you quantify the traffic you are getting from Twitter, especially if people are using applications like Twhirl, or even a mobile phone? I&#8217;ve got a special trick for you, and it&#8217;s really easy to do!</p>
<p>Now for the Trick!</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Step 1: Add a parameter to the URL, such as twitter=1</h2>
<p style="text-align: left;">If your URL is <strong>http://mydomain.com/blog/post.html</strong> then it should be <strong>http://mydomain.com/blog/post.html?twitter=1</strong></p>
<p>If your URL is <strong>http://mydomain.com/blog/2008/5/postname/</strong> then it should be <strong>http://mydomain.com/blog/2008/5/postname/?twitter=1</strong></p>
<p>If your URL is <strong>http://mydomain.com/page.html?id=9</strong> then it should be <strong>http://mydomain.com/page.html?id=9&amp;twitter=1</strong></p>
<p>You can of course use any parameter you want, like tw=1 or source=twitter, be creative. Your analytics program (see step 3 in just a sec) may benefit from using the same one consistently so you can measure all your twitter traffic.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Step 2: Type or cut/paste the new URL into the text box</h2>
<p style="text-align: left;">Put in your link just like you would any other link, just make sure you have the &#8220;twitter=1&#8243; at the end.</p>
<p>You can use the online interface for <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>, or any other application like <a href="http://twhirl.org">Twhirl</a> or <a href="http://iconfactory.com/software/twitterrific">Twitterific</a>. This trick takes advantage of one of Twitter&#8217;s built in capabilities of shortening URLs that are longer than 30 characters using <a href="http://tinyurl.com">TinyURL</a>, so you&#8217;re not wasting any of your precious 140 chars.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Step 3: Track it!</h2>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-396" style="float: left;padding-right:10px;" title="tallying-twitter-traffic" src="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/tallying-twitter-traffic.jpg" alt="" width="198" height="256" /></p>
<p>Using whatever analytics program you use, you should be able to differentiate views by the full URL. With <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a> if you go to Content &gt; Top Content you will see a list of all the viewed pages, including your link with &#8220;twitter=1&#8243; (see page #9 in image for an example). If you don&#8217;t see the page with &#8220;twitter=1&#8243; at the end, do a search at the bottom (Find URL:) for &#8220;twitter=1&#8243;.</p>
<p>Now you can see how many pageviews, unique views, etc. came ONLY from the link you shared from Twitter, giving you a more accurate idea of how many people actually click on the links that you share!</p>
<p>If your analytics program lets you view statistics by parameter, you will want to use the same parameter consistently so you can not only see stats for each page, but for all of your twitter traffic. (I used to be able to do this on Google Analytics, but I don&#8217;t see this feature anymore.)</p>
<p>With this simple trick you can track your Twitter traffic in a jiffy! And if you liked this trick, share it with your friends on Twitter with this URL: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4zjopu">http://tinyurl.com/4zjopu</a></p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re looking for a way to track who else is linking to you, try one of my new Twitter tools, <a href="http://tweetbeep.com">TweetBeep.com</a>. TweetBeep is like Google Alerts for Twitter, and it even has x-ray eyes to see through shortened links, so even if they are disguised with TinyURL, TweetBeep catches them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2008/05/22/tracking-twitter-traffic-trick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Tell iPhone Visitors in Google Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/30/how-to-tell-iphone-visitors-in-google-analytics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/30/how-to-tell-iphone-visitors-in-google-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael D Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/30/how-to-tell-iphone-visitors-in-google-analytics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
You&#8217;re either sick of hearing about the iPhone or you eat up anything said about it. I have gadgetitis, and so does Aaron, so we&#8217;ll be getting iPhones next week. If you&#8217;re a Mac user, the iPhone is a heaven sent, despite what others are saying. I&#8217;ve tried the Sidekick, Blackberry, and the Treo, all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://readscriptures.com"><img id="image259" src="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/iphone-read-scriptures-ipho.gif" alt="iphone scriptures application" align="left" style="padding-right:10px;padding-bottom:10px;" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re either sick of hearing about the iPhone or you eat up anything said about it. I have gadgetitis, and so does Aaron, so we&#8217;ll be getting iPhones next week. If you&#8217;re a Mac user, the iPhone is a heaven sent, despite what <a href="http://daggle.com/070627-170537.html">others</a> are <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/06/29/i-am-not-feeling-the-iphone/">saying</a>. I&#8217;ve tried the Sidekick, Blackberry, and the Treo, all of which either didn&#8217;t sync or really had a lame attempt at syncing with my Mac. Plus, the interface for the phones has been clunky and 1990s at best.</p>
<p>First off, if you&#8217;re interested in iPhone visitors you may want to consider creating an application. I created my first <a href="http://readscriptures.com">iPhone application</a> that so far I have called <a href="http://readscriptures.com">iPhone Scriptures</a> (yes, I&#8217;m religious <img src='http://www.soloseo.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ). I read from the scriptures every day and I like to have them with me when I have a spare moment to read. Since the iPhone doesn&#8217;t allow for 3rd party applications (you know, when you load those on your Treo et al then it starts crashing) except through the browser, I figured I had better just build my own. I found a database of the scriptures and made a quick and simple AJAX interface. It&#8217;s not perfect, but it will improve over time (and especially after I get my iPhone!). You can see what it might look like <a href="http://readscriptures.com/view.php">on an iPhone simulation</a>.</p>
<h4>iPhone Visitors in Google Analytics</h4>
<p><img id="image258" src="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/iphone-resolution-analytics.gif" alt="iPhone resolution google analytics" align="left" style="padding:10px;" /></p>
<p>From initial Google Analytics data from my iPhone app, it looks like the only way to distinguish the iPhone from other Macs is through the screen resolution, which is 320 x 396. You would think there would be some further distinguishing, but not so far. I looked at the browsers, OS, hostnames, and network locations but could not distinguish the group of iPhone visitors through any of those. </p>
<p>So to check for iPhone visitors, open up Google Analytics, go to Visitors, then to Browser Capabilities, then to Screen Resolution. Look for 320 x 396. You may be asking (if you are a crazy iPhone maniac like me) why not 320 x 480? The viewable area of the browser goes down to 396 in height with the address bar area, etc.</p>
<p>Google Analytics is always a bit delayed, so I haven&#8217;t seen a bunch of traffic yet. Plus, I&#8217;m sure reading the New Testament on your new iPhone probably isn&#8217;t on the top of most people&#8217;s lists for discovering its cool features. For anyone with a new iPhone, I found this cool application (well designed, much better than mine) that works as a <a href="http://matthewpeach.com/iphone/">home page for accessing all the different iPhone apps</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/06/30/how-to-tell-iphone-visitors-in-google-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do the Presidential Candidates Rate for SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/13/presidential-candidates-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/13/presidential-candidates-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael D Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/13/presidential-candidates-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A recent article posted on Slashdot looked at various website design points of the top 6 Presidential Candidates. Here I compare SEO statistics of the top 6 Presidential Candidates&#8217; websites: Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Barack Obama, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, and John McCain.
I will compare SEO statistics and information about the age of domain, length [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image153" src="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/american-flag.gif" alt="American Flag Presidential Candidates SEO" align="left" style="padding-right:10px;padding-bottom:10px;" /></p>
<p>A recent article posted on <a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/25/1935215&#038;from=rss">Slashdot</a> looked at various website design points of the top 6 Presidential Candidates. Here I compare SEO statistics of the top 6 Presidential Candidates&#8217; websites: <a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com">Hillary Clinton</a>, <a href="http://www.johnedwards.com">John Edwards</a>, <a href="http://www.barackobama.com">Barack Obama</a>, <a href="http://www.joinrudy2008.com">Rudy Giuliani</a>, <a href="http://www.mittromney.com">Mitt Romney</a>, and <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com">John McCain</a>.</p>
<p>I will compare SEO statistics and information about the age of domain, length of domain registration, domain characteristics, backlinks, Technorati links, .edu links, Alexa Rank, Page Strength, indexed pages, supplemental results, name search on Google, other search terms on Google, and pay-per-click. The order of candidates is listed in order of &#8220;rank&#8221; within each category of statistics.</p>
<h4>Age of Domain</h4>
<p>This comes from either Alexa data or WHOIS data. The age of domain is important in SEO because older sites typically hold more credibility and trust with search engines.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton &#8211; 22-Oct-2001<br />
John Edwards &#8211; 16-Jul-1998<br />
Barack Obama &#8211; 28-Dec-2004<br />
John McCain &#8211; 17-Jul-1997<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 08-Feb-2002<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 17-Nov-2006</p>
<h4>Length of Domain Registration</h4>
<p>This statistic looks at how many years the domain has been registered for beyond the create date (based on WHOIS data), and the candidates are listed in descending order of year that the domain expires. It&#8217;s considered good SEO practice to register a domain for a longer amount of time (5+ years)</p>
<p>John McCain &#8211; 15 years, expires 26-Jan-2017<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; 15 years, expires 22-Oct-2016<br />
Barack Obama &#8211; 11 years, expires 28-Dec-2015<br />
John Edwards &#8211; 11 years, expires 14-Jul-2009<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 8 years, expires 08-Feb-2010<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 2 years, expires 17-Nov-2008</p>
<h4>Type in Domain</h4>
<p>Everyone except Rudy Giuliani has a perfect type in domain for their name, so you can just type in their name, add the .com and you&#8217;re at their site. This may hurt Rudy a little, but his last name is hard to remember how to spell for many so perhaps joinrudy2008.com is better in some ways.</p>
<h4>Backlinks</h4>
<p>Backlinks, or inbound links, are how many sites link to your site. These figures are from Yahoo.</p>
<p>Barack Obama &#8211; 119,909<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; 79,219<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 39,245<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 38,236<br />
John Edwards &#8211; 15,498<br />
John McCain &#8211; 7,428</p>
<h4>Technorati Links</h4>
<p>This is used as a measure of popularity in the blogosphere world. The more the better.</p>
<p>Barack Obama &#8211; 6,527<br />
John Edwards &#8211; 4,952<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; 3,710<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 1,756<br />
John McCain &#8211; 670<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 342</p>
<h4>.edu links</h4>
<p>Links from educational institutions are regarded as passing more weight or confidence as a backlink, and are highly desirable (and hard to get).</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton &#8211; 97<br />
Barack Obama &#8211; 87<br />
John Edwards &#8211; 35<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 33<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 21<br />
John McCain &#8211; 0</p>
<h4>Alexa Rank</h4>
<p>I know Alexa isn&#8217;t perfect, but it&#8217;s an interesting comparison. The lower the number, &#8220;the better&#8221;. The number represents the rank of the website out of the top websites on the Internet in terms of traffic. The most visited site on the Internet is ranked 1. A zero (0) means either an error or not enough traffic to rank.</p>
<p>Barack Obama &#8211; 12,581<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; 18,727<br />
John Edwards &#8211; 33,485<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 129,490<br />
John McCain &#8211; 178,788<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 0</p>
<h4>Page Strength</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/johnedwards.com">John Edwards</a> &#8211; 6.5/10<br />
<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/hillaryclinton.com">Hillary Clinton</a> &#8211; 5.5/10<br />
<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/barackobama.com">Barack Obama</a> &#8211; 5/0<br />
<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/mittromney.com">Mitt Romney</a> &#8211; 4/10<br />
<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/joinrudy2008.com">Rudy Giuliani</a> &#8211; 3.5/10<br />
<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/johnmccain.com">John McCain</a> &#8211; 3.5/10</p>
<h4>Indexed Pages</h4>
<p>Google and Yahoo both give a different number of pages in their index, so I&#8217;ll show both, Google/Yahoo.</p>
<p>John Edwards &#8211; 4230/66<br />
John McCain &#8211; 457/155<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; 387/1133<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 309/157<br />
Barack Obama &#8211; 148/525<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 91/34</p>
<h4>Supplemental Results</h4>
<p>If pages show up as supplemental results (<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.mydomain.com+***+-adsflswef">use this query, just change domain</a>) it means they aren&#8217;t carrying as much as weight as they could be and their rankings probably suffer. The figure shown below is supplemental/total indexed, as well as what percent of pages are supplemental results out of their total number of indexed pages (both from Google). Lower % is better.</p>
<p>John Edwards &#8211; 260/4230 (6%)<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 71/309 (23%)<br />
John McCain &#8211; 104/457 (23%)<br />
Barack Obama &#8211; 35/148 (24%)<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 38/91 (42%)<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; 168/387 (43%)</p>
<h4>Name search on Google</h4>
<p>If you type in the candidate&#8217;s name in Google, where does their &#8220;official&#8221; election site come up in the SERPs?</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton &#8211; 1st result<br />
Barack Obama &#8211; 1st result<br />
John Edwards &#8211; 1st result<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; 1st result<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 2nd result, 1st is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudy_Giuliani" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia entry</a><br />
John McCain &#8211; 33rd result, 1st is <a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">his Senate page</a></p>
<h4>Rankings for name, party, etc</h4>
<p>Terms searched for included: presidential election, presidential candidates, 2008 elections, compare candidates, and candidates issues. The top 100 results were checked for each search term. If no ranking is listed below, the candidates site does not rank in the top 100 for that term.</p>
<p>Barack Obama &#8211; #35 for presidential candidates, #66 for candidates issues<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; (none)<br />
John Edwards &#8211; (none)<br />
John McCain &#8211; (none)<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; (none)<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; (none)</p>
<h4>Pay-Per-Click (PPC)</h4>
<p>Terms searched for included: presidential election, presidential candidates, 2008 elections, compare candidates, candidates issues, democrat, democratic party, republican, and republican party. Certainly there are many others I could have typed for but these are ones I thought would be critical to any PPC campaign.</p>
<p>Barack Obama &#8211; presidential election, presidential candidates, 2008 elections, democrat, democratic party,<br />
John McCain &#8211; presidential election, presidential candidates<br />
Hillary Clinton &#8211; (none)<br />
John Edwards &#8211; (none)<br />
Mitt Romney &#8211; (none)<br />
Rudy Giuliani &#8211; (none)</p>
<p>Obviously we are very early on in the elections, but certainly SEO efforts should be underway if they are going to occur at all. In some ways it is evident there are definitely SEO strategies in place, but what about the lack of PPC? What are some of your observations?</p>
<p>Also check out my post from yesterday about <a href="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/12/what-presidential-candidates-use-for-analytics/">what Analytics programs the Presidential Candidates are using</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/13/presidential-candidates-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do the Presidential Candidates use for Analytics?</title>
		<link>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/12/what-presidential-candidates-use-for-analytics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/12/what-presidential-candidates-use-for-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael D Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/12/what-presidential-candidates-use-for-analytics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it would be interesting to look at all of the top presidential candidates and see what they are using for analytics for their site. I visited each site, viewed source, and looked for Javascript code or any other trace of analytics code I could find.
Hillary Clinton uses Google Analytics
John Edwards uses Google Analytics
Barack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it would be interesting to look at all of the top presidential candidates and see what they are using for analytics for their site. I visited each site, viewed source, and looked for Javascript code or any other trace of analytics code I could find.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com">Hillary Clinton</a> uses <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnedwards.com">John Edwards</a> uses <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.barackobama.com">Barack Obama</a> uses <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.joinrudy2008.com">Rudy Giuliani</a> uses <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mittromney.com">Mitt Romney</a> uses <a href="http://www.omniture.com">Omniture</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnmccain.com">John McCain</a> uses either <a href="http://www.revsci.net/">Revenue Science</a> (if they have some analytics system built-in) or it is a server-based (non-Javascript) analytics solution.</p>
<p>We use Google Analytics for SoloSEO but I have heard Omniture is a great solution too. Setting up with Omniture takes a little bit of work because you need to put in variables for each page (like page name), but other than that it is pretty easy and has lots of features.</p>
<p>I would suggest the candidates use <a href="http://crazyegg.com/">Crazy Egg</a> and track where people are clicking around on the site. We&#8217;ve discovered a lot of interesting behavior on our site, I can only imagine having that much more traffic and learning what you can do to maximize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/12/what-presidential-candidates-use-for-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

